Another Blogger’s Subpoena Revealed
Public records filed February 11th 2008 revealed that a moderator from the website RoseSpeaks was served with a subpoena by attorneys for Virgie Arthur that has been been objected to by Howard K. Stern. The documents were filed in the court case of Virgie Arthur vs Howard K. Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston. Grounds stated for the objection are that notice was not given to Stern concerning the intention to serve the subpoena and that discovery has not yet started in the case. The same discovery argument was stated in Sterns objection to subpoenas served to Rose and Ken Turner who are the owners of the website RoseSpeaks.
Also posted for the same lawsuit were notices that subpoenas were withdrawn for RoseSpeaks two owners and the moderator without prejudice until after the conclusion of the inquest into the death of Daniel Wayne Smith, Virgie Arthur’s grandson. The inquest is scheduled to resume on March 17th.
Objection-to-Lyndal-subpoena-no-discovery-yet.pdf
Object-Lyndal-subpoena-exhibitA.pdf
KenT-subpoena-withdrawn.pdf
Lyndal_subpoena_withdrawn_until_after_inquest_02-11-08_new.pdf
You can read the documents that John O’Quinn filed in the Florida case yesterday in the “Legal Documents” section at the top middle list of pages.
:arrow:
JMO
lol
February 12th, 2008 at 9:26 AM
Many thanks for the latest, QV !
At Virgie’s convenience, quite appropiate.
I just hope the subpoenas continue until every last culprit is called to book.
February 12th, 2008 at 12:02 PM
Hope they get them all. Wonder how long it will take for the answer to Howards objections. I think these people thought you could just have fun having a blog and take no responsibility
February 12th, 2008 at 12:40 PM
Looks like the Judge ordered “jurisdictional discovery” in December, 2007 so the subpoena’s were valid. I think it’s rather cute that McCabe put the bloggers on notice that he can and will subpoena thier records at a future date if necessary. He probably already has the jurisdictional information he needs already.
All Stern can do about it now is delay the Inquest as long as possible, which it appears is the tactic that he is now using. If he really care about Daniel and Anna, he would be seeking justice for them as well.
For Daniel, he would not continue to interrupt and delay the proceedings.
For Anna, he would not continue to befriend the doctor who clearly overprescribed the drugs that killed Anna.
His actions speak louder about his so-called “love” (or lack thereof) for the deceased parties, and indicate an agenda that is self-serving at the very least and highly sinister at the very most.
February 12th, 2008 at 1:08 PM
WOW NOW I hear its Howards turn to suponea MRS Marple, and a few others who say they have proof Howard murdered Anna and Daniel. I wonder why they have not turned that proof over to the authorities, That is with-holding evidence.
February 12th, 2008 at 2:54 PM
Anonymous Says:
February 12th, 2008 at 1:08 pm
WOW NOW I hear its Howards turn to suponea MRS Marple, and a few others who say they have proof Howard murdered Anna and Daniel. I wonder why they have not turned that proof over to the authorities, That is with-holding evidence.
———
Which lawsuit would he subpoena Mrs Marples for? She’s not connected with any of the lawsuits.
imo
February 12th, 2008 at 2:56 PM
Does anyone understand the ’secret subpoena’ wording? Is there a reason it will served in that manner?
February 12th, 2008 at 2:57 PM
will should be ‘was’.
February 12th, 2008 at 3:09 PM
Another reader, I think he was referring to this rule:
If the subpoena commands the production of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things or the inspection of premises before trial, then before it is served, a notice must be served on each party.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule45.htm
Under 45 (b) (1)
February 12th, 2008 at 3:30 PM
Anonymous Says:
February 12th, 2008 at 1:08 pm
WOW NOW I hear its Howards turn to suponea MRS Marple, and a few others who say they have proof Howard murdered Anna and Daniel. I wonder why they have not turned that proof over to the authorities, That is with-holding evidence.
******************************
How do you know they haven’t?
February 12th, 2008 at 3:41 PM
Thank you Karma.
February 12th, 2008 at 4:09 PM
OFF TOPIC
http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2008/02/12/2008-02-12_authors_of_new_anna_nicole_smith_book_su.html
February 12th, 2008 at 5:12 PM
Oh that article is too funny!
Simpson and Atteu acknowledge signing an agreement with Gibson, but told me Monday they regarded the document as a “draft.” And quite apart from making any money from the book, they say they gave her $3,000 toward expenses.
****
Sounds like a “vanity” publisher in which the author DOES have to pay toward having the book published. And as for not reading the contract they signed and thought it was a draft; who signs a “draft” contract? Are they taking a page out of Larry’s book in not reading what they sign?
Unbelievable! (And if this is considered off-topic, I apologize in advance - but it does deserve comment. Who would have thought. ROFLMAO!)
February 12th, 2008 at 6:09 PM
I agree, and a little humor never hurts!
February 12th, 2008 at 7:17 PM
http://bamacatart.blogspot.com/
This new one is so good Cat.
February 12th, 2008 at 7:31 PM
Cat needs a proofreader.
pass should be past
were should be where
Nothing’s weird anymore.
February 12th, 2008 at 7:49 PM
IF anyone from Rose reads this will you please tell Lynderella that I am VERY VERY sorry for posting the wrong doc with her info still on it.
I am not going to make any excuses. I should have checked and rechecked. Very sorry Lynderella. I know about the hate and threats coming from both sides and I did not intend to do that.
February 12th, 2008 at 7:50 PM
And pssssssssssst. The documents posted here are from Pacer. Someone’s nose is growing.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:45 PM
If you go up to the top and middle where it says “Legal Documents” the docs that were filed by John O’Quinn on the 11th (yesterday) in the Florida case are there too.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:12 PM
I hope they don’t forget susieq and all the other mean hefers.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:31 PM
Sounds like O’Quin has bailed out on some of you. Just read his filings.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:37 PM
junebug Says:
February 12th, 2008 at 10:31 pm
Sounds like O’Quin has bailed out on some of you. Just read his filings.
====
O’Quinn knows exactly what he is doing. He is one of the best. Junebug Have you been reading what Rose says? Is that why you wrote it here.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:47 PM
18431. 18426. The best part of O’Quinn’s response was I never believed that Mr. Stern did anything to Anna or Daniel. Nor do I ever think that he was a blackmailer. Any reasonable person would know that I didn’t mean it when I said Mr. Stern murdered Anna or Daniel. I didn’t mean it when I said that Howard was blackmailing Larry. I know Mr. Stern didn’t do those things, and if people on the blogs believed me then they are just stupid kool-aid drinkers.
Posted at 5:19PM on Feb 12th 2008 by HaHaHaHaHa I cannot stop laughing
********************************
Found this on TMZ….Where are those words in Oquinn’s reply? I didn’t see these words anywhere in the document.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:56 PM
O’Quinn bailed? How do you figure? The only people I know of who didn’t have the sense to realize that O’Quinn wasn’t factually calling Howard a murderer are the Sternies. They’ve had their panties in wads and thier faces all red for over a year because they believed O’Quinn accused Howard of murder.
If O’Quinn has “bailed” on anyone, it’s the Sternies. That’s what they get though, for seeing only what they want to see and attacking everyone who isn’t madly in love with HKS.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:18 PM
It seems to me that the only people who took O’Quinn’s words seriously are the Sternies. They’re the ones who’ve had their panties in a bunch for well over a year because they refused to believe that O’Quinn wasn’t factually accusing Howard of murder. If O’Quinn has bailed on anyone, it’s them. So sorry, Sternies - you spend a year with your faces all read and bloated for nothing. We tried to tell you.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:18 PM
Oops, sorry. That should say ‘red’ not ‘read’.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:52 PM
Arrg! Please excuse the 2 similar posts - the first one was lost in cyberspace for a while so I repeated it.
February 13th, 2008 at 12:04 AM
Matilda, you are absolutely right. From the very beginning it has been “argued” by myself and others that this lawsuit was bogus from the get-go as O’Quinn was merely speaking on behalf of his Client, as many lawyers do. It’s not defamation, and Stern will lose. Remember the one statement by O’Quinn: “My Client believes….and I agree”. We’ve been saying it all along.
It’s only those that support Stern that believe that O’Quinn defamed Stern because it is THEY who took O’Quinn’s words and took them too seriously. EVERY GOOD lawyer will represent their Client with such “spin”. OJ’s lawyers, MJ’s lawyers, they are all the same when they speak to the media. You, the viewer, determine what you wish to believe.
But, again, note his words: “My Client believes…..and I agree”. Case Closed. Stern loses. It’s been fun..lol
February 13th, 2008 at 12:27 AM
Does Daniel’s Inquest start on the 17th of this month?
February 13th, 2008 at 12:29 AM
oh sheesh, I mean March.
February 13th, 2008 at 1:06 AM
I’m speechless, LOL.
February 13th, 2008 at 1:15 AM
“freida Says:
February 12th, 2008 at 7:31 pm
Cat needs a proofreader.”
Sorry, I am human.
I have corrected.
Thanks to all who enjoy & comment on my site.
I do appreciate it.
We need some humor in this crazy hate filled quest for truth & justice.
February 13th, 2008 at 1:18 AM
Thanks Bama.We appreciate all you do and you are veerryy talented.
February 13th, 2008 at 1:28 AM
Hey, I make typos too, and can’t spell worth shi!
I lean heavily on ‘Spellcheck’…
is that one word?
February 13th, 2008 at 2:50 AM
I just came from HOH’s board and I must say, I’m not shocked. Rosie and the Romantics are at it again and what beats all is I haven’t found a single Sternie that has done any real research into this case. All they have are superficial opinions on what others have said….not what they have determined on their own. Pretty pathetic, in my opinion. At least here on QV’s site, there are some who seem proud of the research they have done and have drawn educated opinions. Thank you, QV, for the forum to speak our minds.
February 13th, 2008 at 2:59 AM
Hi Alamogirl
I admire you. You are such a nice, loyal personn,
*Note from QV… Some fly-by jerk using a proxy from Colorado.
February 13th, 2008 at 3:04 AM
Anonymous, you are spiteful.
February 13th, 2008 at 3:08 AM
I know you are only speaking for yourself….you don’t have a clue outside YOUR small mind.
But thanks for your limp-noodled input.
February 13th, 2008 at 11:57 AM
BamaCat Says:
February 13th, 2008 at 1:15 am
“freida Says:
February 12th, 2008 at 7:31 pm
Cat needs a proofreader.”
Sorry, I am human.
I have corrected.
Thanks to all who enjoy & comment on my site.
I do appreciate it.
We need some humor in this crazy hate filled quest for truth & justice.
*******
Hey I must be ab;eto read. I didn’t catch anything wrong before you changed whatever Cat.
I love your site and you are very talented.
February 13th, 2008 at 12:00 PM
I can’t spell either it seems from above. It is to say Hey I must not be able to read
February 13th, 2008 at 4:58 PM
I find it amusing that the stern bobble heads act like they discovered America or something.
These latest filings by O’Quinn to HKS have nothing new in them.
Had they read the original response from a few months ago, they would know that, but it looks like they can’t formulate their own thoughts.
They need Art and now Rose to give them the talking points which are based on pure spin, nothing factual or reasoned.
Guess they don’t get paid to read, think, opine, but just to spew the spin.
February 13th, 2008 at 7:51 PM
Quiet on here. Was QV’s sob story not suppose to draw crowds? Four members only? Shame…
The great minds are having fun all over the place and you are stuck with…?
Whats the matter. PO’ed cause you got caught using a proxy leaving hateful comments like this one? Not to mention because HKS got outed? Let me tell you something hateful person. I don’t need any comments on here to tell the truth. Now that is fun! QV
February 13th, 2008 at 8:06 PM
Ok, I’m off, this place is deserted…
THought QV telling it all would help, oh well, perhaps Kerry and Einy are working on another spin special…
February 13th, 2008 at 8:09 PM
Bye lonely QV.
Hate and bitterness have left you deserted. And Rose is still going STRONG! And so is ART!!
February 13th, 2008 at 8:11 PM
Gosh, you call it hate? But you will know, you are the hate expert. I call it calling you on the truth of your actions.
February 13th, 2008 at 8:14 PM
Previous was adrressed to you QV. Bye then
February 13th, 2008 at 8:17 PM
Sorry to bust your bubble but we are still here for QV. Just because we are not making idiotic posts such as yours just to say something doesn’t mean we are not here.
February 13th, 2008 at 8:25 PM
Therestofthestory
OK, glad to see you have changed, you all have been making idotic posts for a long time..
But to bear your soul and only end up with four members, that is embarrasing.
February 13th, 2008 at 8:37 PM
Alright this anonymous person isn’t doing anything but coming here to start sh*t and I believe that I know who this is without their name. I can tell by the words and writing style. You should be ashamed of your post. They are hateful and vindictive to say the least. I don’t agree with everything QV says or writes but I’m not going to come here to start crap. I come here to read and see if there is something new and interesting that might put something in a different view for me.
I support HKS and I behave myself. You should to. Your just the type of person that gives the rest of the HKS supporters a bad rap.
February 13th, 2008 at 8:38 PM
to say the least. Sorry for the typo. QV could you correct that for me?
February 13th, 2008 at 8:55 PM
Who says I am a Howard supporter, Gosh!! I can’t stand the man!
But QV should be able to take critique, she dashed it out to others, now she can’t take it?
February 13th, 2008 at 8:58 PM
I am just giving QV her very own medicine.
February 13th, 2008 at 9:04 PM
I,m off, really this time.
QV had her 15 minutes of fame, what is wrong with that!!
February 13th, 2008 at 9:09 PM
Looks like you might be the lonely one. To come here and make multiple post and try to cause Drama.
February 13th, 2008 at 9:17 PM
I agree with Mish..Anonymous, looks like your 15 minutes are up! You are embarrassing yourself by posting here.
February 13th, 2008 at 9:19 PM
The only hate I see posted here is from people that are angry that QV took the high road and exposed Bonnie Stern, HKS, Rose and the minions for what they are.
For the past year, those of us that don’t support HKS have been berated, made fun of and banned from message boards because we weren’t willing to ignore logic and swallow all the ridiculous explantions that were put out there by the Howard Stern spin machine.
I applaud QV for having the fortitude to speak the truth. And I’m grateful to her for allowing people to finally say what they’ve wanted to for months without fear of being ganged up on or banned. I find it amusing that those people that have been spewing their venom to anyone that disagreed with are now crying foul. Seems like they can dish it out but certainly can’t take it.
February 13th, 2008 at 9:24 PM
Most people have a problem with “critique” in the form of bashing and ignorant baiting by people who prefer to remain “anonymous”. . QV may be one of them.
February 13th, 2008 at 9:30 PM
I certainly agree that QV has many, many supporters.
February 13th, 2008 at 9:48 PM
Phoebe Says:
February 13th, 2008 at 9:19 pm
For the past year, those of us that don’t support HKS have been berated, made fun of and banned from message boards because we weren’t willing to ignore logic and swallow all the ridiculous explantions that were put out there by the Howard Stern spin machine.
________________________________
Now change that around a little, replace HKS with Virgie and that is exactly how a lot of us feel. Each side is the same. Each side has their beliefs, thier convictions, their idiots. The difference is one side believes in Howard the other Virgie. I don’t understand why both sides can’t just have a intellegent conversation without all the crap. I think what happened is in the beginning “the idiots” from each side went about bashing, name calling and all that other crap and people from each side drew their lines in the sand and it took off from there.
I guess what I am saying is that there are people on both side who could act a lot better.
February 13th, 2008 at 10:19 PM
Anonymous Says:
February 13th, 2008 at 8:25 pm
Therestofthestory
OK, glad to see you have changed, you all have been making idotic posts for a long time..
But to bear your soul and only end up with four members, that is embarrasing.
No, what’s embarrassing is watching idiots running wild all over the net, out of control, making some of the most laughable posts out of desperation, because they’ve been caught. It’s called ‘idiotic’ behavior.
No one has left here..in fact, many more have come, so run along as Rosie and the Romantics are missing their village idiot and they need all the help they can get.
QV is admired for her integrity, bravery to tell her story, honesty, and ability to admit when she is wrong. Many of us never came to this site or knew QV until now but we find her very credible because she confirmed (with much proof) what we all have believed from the minute Daniel was taken from this earth.
So, you better hurry back over to the little house of cards to get more instructions. Hurry along now because you’re help is needed to come up with more ‘idiotic posts’ to spread around.
February 13th, 2008 at 10:37 PM
QV has the best site on the net with the Anna saga. The rest are mean and have so many people bashing each other. I only see a couple of jealous people here that bash. QV keep up the good work.
February 13th, 2008 at 10:40 PM
Uh oh Says:
February 13th, 2008 at 8:37 pm
Alright this anonymous person isn’t doing anything but coming here to start sh*t and I believe that I know who this is without their name. I can tell by the words and writing style. You should be ashamed of your post. They are hateful and vindictive to say the least. I don’t agree with everything QV says or writes but I’m not going to come here to start crap. I come here to read and see if there is something new and interesting that might put something in a different view for me.
I support HKS and I behave myself. You should to. Your just the type of person that gives the rest of the HKS supporters a bad rap.
——
I really respect your post. I know who the other person is that is for stern and is mean too. I am against Stern but we still can have a good relationship between us. Thank you.
February 13th, 2008 at 10:44 PM
Anonymous Says:
February 13th, 2008 at 8:06 pm
Ok, I’m off, this place is deserted…
THought QV telling it all would help, oh well, perhaps Kerry and Einy are working on another spin special…
—-
I am sure you are so unhappy in your soul as you are showing it. Hate makes bitterness and it shows what you are. Maybe you have reason to have this much hate but it will destroy you and nobody else. It doesn’t make QV or me or anyone else angry only your heart and soul.
February 13th, 2008 at 10:48 PM
Could this person with the hate be an older lady from Indiana?
February 13th, 2008 at 10:59 PM
dolittle Says:
February 13th, 2008 at 10:40 pm
I really respect your post. I know who the other person is that is for stern and is mean too. I am against Stern but we still can have a good relationship between us. Thank you.
—————————–
Thank you. We can have a good relationship between us. That is what I’m hoping happens. At least with me. I will always be respectful of you or anyone here even if our opinions differ.
February 13th, 2008 at 10:59 PM
Anonymous Says:
February 13th, 2008 at 8:58 pm
I am just giving QV her very own medicine.
====
This person has been giving Topix a lot of trouble. This person is from Ga. She is one troubled person. Has so much hate.
February 13th, 2008 at 11:26 PM
Thank you so much everyone for your support and your belief in me. It does not go unnoticed at all.
And the people that support Howard but still friendly, you know who you are. Some behind the scenes and some out in the open… you are much appreciated.
All of you. You really astound me in the midst of all this controversy and Ill never forget it or you.
I am going to have to make the blog so that in order to post that you must be registered. Ill make a main post about it and explain how to do it.
Thanks again to everyone..
February 13th, 2008 at 11:32 PM
Qv
Thanks for that :)
February 14th, 2008 at 12:21 AM
I enjoyed the Freedom here it has been a ‘real trip.’
Coincidence?
February 14th, 2008 at 12:35 AM
Lynderella, Nice way to NOT accept an apology. If I wanted to broadcast your last name and address, I would have left them on ALL the documents. The ONE original was uploaded by mistake. As far as who downloaded it. I guess you don’t realize that anyone can have a Pacer account that wants one and can get that information all by themselves.
And what about Rose and Ken? Their names have been plastered all over the net for many years. You mean I knew that and you didn’t? I removed their address as a courtesy of course as I did yours.
You are correct about one thing. I am not QV. I am actually John O’Quinn.
February 14th, 2008 at 12:42 AM
wonder who Says:
February 13th, 2008 at 10:48 pm e
Could this person with the hate be an older lady from Indiana?
****************************
wonder who, this one is using a fake IP. In other words, a proxy. Which if anyone tries to register with a fake IP in order to harass and cause problems. It will be deleted.
February 14th, 2008 at 1:22 AM
If a real estate agent posts somebody’s personal info. Could they lose their license?
February 14th, 2008 at 1:23 AM
You are correct about one thing. I am not QV. I am actually John O’Quinn.
QV, I wish you were! LOLOLOLOL
February 14th, 2008 at 1:28 AM
QV, I would not apologize to Lynderella at all because it was Lin Wood that published her name and address….haha isn’t that funny! and we do know that she is a real estate agent. That is no secret cause it was on her “myspace” page…imagine a grown woman having a myspace. I thought that was for kids and teenagers.
February 14th, 2008 at 1:29 AM
Don’t know myself Alamo, but one that tracks someone’s address using their credentials and then threatens to burn their house down could lose their freedom. IMO
February 14th, 2008 at 1:43 AM
It was LIn Wood tha published Lyndal’s addy so QV, you should not apologize any more.Lyndal is a real estate agent.That was posted on her myspace page.Imagine a grown woman with a myspace…thought that was for kids and teenagers.
February 14th, 2008 at 1:45 AM
QV, could you check my last post. It went to spam. Maybe something in it that caused it not to post.Thanks
Btw, I like the registration aspect.
February 14th, 2008 at 2:46 AM
Alamo, It did go to spam. And good point since the other blog says that “the attorneys” need to learn how to use whiteout.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:01 AM
AlamoGirl Says:
February 14th, 2008 at 1:23 am
You are correct about one thing. I am not QV. I am actually John O’Quinn.
*****
I wish…ROFLMAO!! I would LOVE to post with one of the attorneys. Even Lin Wood. It would be fun to challenge their knowledge and beliefs. See how they handle the hard questions. One could dream…lol
February 16th, 2008 at 7:17 PM
Rachel, you are funny…that’s why attorneys have legal aides; to address all this stuff they don’t know!